top of page

Understanding No-Contest Clauses in Wills and Trusts

  • Holly Kuklenski
  • Jun 10
  • 2 min read

A no-contest clause, also referred to as an in terrorem clause, is a provision that may be included in a Will or Trust to deter beneficiaries from contesting the document without a valid reason. These clauses aim to reduce family conflicts and prevent unnecessary legal battles after a person's death.


How No-Contest Clauses Work


Usually, a no-contest clause specifies that if a beneficiary contests the Will or Trust without probable cause, they risk forfeiting their inheritance entirely. This potential loss of inheritance acts as a strong deterrent against baseless or emotionally driven challenges.


For example, consider a scenario where a father divides his estate equally among his three children, but one child is dissatisfied with their portion, and decides to contest the Will solely out of discontent, and not any suspicion of fraud or undue influence. If a no-contest clause is present and the Court determines there was no probable cause for the challenge, that child could lose their entire inheritance.


The Law in Idaho


According to Idaho Code § 15-3-905, and the Uniform Probate Code, a no-contest clause is unenforceable if there is probable cause for the challenge. Although the statute does not strictly define "probable cause," courts generally assess whether sufficient evidence exists to lead a reasonable person to believe the contest might be successful.


For instance, in a situation where a caregiver is added to a Will just weeks before the testator's death, and there are concerns about diminished capacity or undue influence, a beneficiary raising these issues could be found to have probable cause, even if the Court ultimately upholds the will. In such cases, the no-contest clause would not apply and would be considered moot.


Practical Considerations and Limitations


While no-contest clauses can promote cooperation and safeguard the testator’s intentions, they have limitations. A clause does not automatically prevent all challenges. If a beneficiary has legitimate concerns about the estate plan's validity, such as forgery, fraud, coercion, or mental incapacity at the time of signing, a Court is unlikely to enforce the penalty stated in the clause.


Furthermore, these clauses may have little effect on individuals who were already disinherited. If someone receives nothing under the Will or Trust, they have no inheritance to lose by contesting. If they succeed and the document is invalidated, they could inherit a portion of the estate under Idaho’s intestacy laws. For instance, a disinherited adult child might challenge a Will and, if successful, could inherit a share of the estate as if no Will existed.


Should You Include a No-Contest Clause?


Incorporating a no-contest clause in your estate planning documents can be an effective way to emphasize your intentions and decrease the likelihood of disputes. However, it is not a guaranteed solution against legal challenges and should be used thoughtfully, especially in situations involving unequal distributions or complex family dynamics.


Consulting with an experienced estate planning attorney is the best approach to determine whether a no-contest clause suits your circumstances. A well crafted estate plan, along with clear communication, often provides the best protection against future disputes.




Comments


bottom of page